<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Getting in Deeper on FWLT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mytradersjournal.com/stock-options/2008/03/05/getting-in-deeper-on-fwlt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mytradersjournal.com/stock-options/2008/03/05/getting-in-deeper-on-fwlt/</link>
	<description>Investing in Stocks Through Options</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 05:09:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Fotopoulos</title>
		<link>http://mytradersjournal.com/stock-options/2008/03/05/getting-in-deeper-on-fwlt/#comment-2440</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Fotopoulos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 01:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mytradersjournal.com/stock-options/2008/03/05/getting-in-deeper-on-fwlt/#comment-2440</guid>
		<description>re Support on FWLT - I saw that and was pissed that I sold this extra put two days too early.  I have until April on these puts, so I&#039;m riding it out.  Fundamentals will pay off for this one at some point, probably. 
On the technical side I was banking too heavily on that short trend line that just broke.  I really broke my own rule to sell that close to the money in this market.  Spilled milk now.  Interesting though, the closing price today was 2 cents above the intraday low on Feb 7th which was the the low of Feb.  My next hope for support (aside from hoping this dip was a one day deal) is 60.  FWLT could retest the Jan intraday low down to 55, but doubt (aka hope) it will.  Earnings are over and it&#039;s just macro economic fear pushing it down now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re Support on FWLT &#8211; I saw that and was pissed that I sold this extra put two days too early.  I have until April on these puts, so I&#8217;m riding it out.  Fundamentals will pay off for this one at some point, probably.<br />
On the technical side I was banking too heavily on that short trend line that just broke.  I really broke my own rule to sell that close to the money in this market.  Spilled milk now.  Interesting though, the closing price today was 2 cents above the intraday low on Feb 7th which was the the low of Feb.  My next hope for support (aside from hoping this dip was a one day deal) is 60.  FWLT could retest the Jan intraday low down to 55, but doubt (aka hope) it will.  Earnings are over and it&#8217;s just macro economic fear pushing it down now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Options Strategery</title>
		<link>http://mytradersjournal.com/stock-options/2008/03/05/getting-in-deeper-on-fwlt/#comment-2437</link>
		<dc:creator>Options Strategery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 21:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mytradersjournal.com/stock-options/2008/03/05/getting-in-deeper-on-fwlt/#comment-2437</guid>
		<description>@1 - Are you thinking of FSLR?

FWLT through the support at 65 on slightly heavy volume.  Be careful.  It was weak throughout the day even as the S&amp;P fought off the ugly job numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@1 &#8211; Are you thinking of FSLR?</p>
<p>FWLT through the support at 65 on slightly heavy volume.  Be careful.  It was weak throughout the day even as the S&amp;P fought off the ugly job numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Fotopoulos</title>
		<link>http://mytradersjournal.com/stock-options/2008/03/05/getting-in-deeper-on-fwlt/#comment-2432</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Fotopoulos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 04:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mytradersjournal.com/stock-options/2008/03/05/getting-in-deeper-on-fwlt/#comment-2432</guid>
		<description>FWLT is not a solar stock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FWLT is not a solar stock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://mytradersjournal.com/stock-options/2008/03/05/getting-in-deeper-on-fwlt/#comment-2427</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 01:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mytradersjournal.com/stock-options/2008/03/05/getting-in-deeper-on-fwlt/#comment-2427</guid>
		<description>these solar stocks are in the dump stage of pump-and-dump .  if not now, they will be as the s&amp;p breaks support at 1310.  I&#039;d go with writing uncovered calls.  uncovered puts?   i don&#039;t get it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>these solar stocks are in the dump stage of pump-and-dump .  if not now, they will be as the s&amp;p breaks support at 1310.  I&#8217;d go with writing uncovered calls.  uncovered puts?   i don&#8217;t get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

